首页> 外文OA文献 >Diagnostic accuracy of 18F amyloid PET tracers for the diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis:a systematic review and meta-analysis
【2h】

Diagnostic accuracy of 18F amyloid PET tracers for the diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis:a systematic review and meta-analysis

机译:18F淀粉样蛋白PET示踪剂对阿尔茨海默氏病的诊断准确性:系统评价和荟萃分析:系统评价和荟萃分析

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Imaging or tissue biomarker evidence has been introduced into the core diagnostic pathway for Alzheimer’s disease (AD). PET using 18F-labelled beta-amyloid PET tracers has shown promise for the early diagnosis of AD. However, most studies included only small numbers of participants and no consensus has been reached as to which radiotracer has the highest diagnostic accuracy. First, we performed a systematic review of the literature published between 1990 and 2014 for studies exploring the diagnostic accuracy of florbetaben, florbetapir and flutemetamol in AD. The included studies were analysed using the QUADAS assessment of methodological quality. A meta-analysis of the sensitivity and specificity reported within each study was performed. Pooled values were calculated for each radiotracer and for visual or quantitative analysis by population included. The systematic review identified nine studies eligible for inclusion. There were limited variations in the methods between studies reporting the same radiotracer. The meta-analysis results showed that pooled sensitivity and specificity values were in general high for all tracers. This was confirmed by calculating likelihood ratios. A patient with a positive ratio is much more likely to have AD than a patient with a negative ratio, and vice versa. However, specificity was higher when only patients with AD were compared with healthy controls. This systematic review and meta-analysis found no marked differences in the diagnostic accuracy of the three beta-amyloid radiotracers. All tracers perform better when used to discriminate between patients with AD and healthy controls. The sensitivity and specificity for quantitative and visual analysis are comparable to those of other imaging or biomarker techniques used to diagnose AD. Further research is required to identify the combination of tests that provides the highest sensitivity and specificity, and to identify the most suitable position for the tracer in the clinical pathway.
机译:成像或组织生物标志物证据已被引入阿尔茨海默氏病(AD)的核心诊断途径。使用18F标记的β-淀粉样蛋白PET示踪剂的PET对AD的早期诊断显示出希望。但是,大多数研究仅包括少量的参与者,并且尚未就哪种放射性示踪剂具有最高诊断准确性达成共识。首先,我们对1990年至2014年间发表的文献进行了系统的综述,以探讨florbetaben,florbetapir和flutemetamol在AD中的诊断准确性。使用QUADAS方法学质量评估对纳入的研究进行分析。对每项研究报告的敏感性和特异性进行了荟萃分析。计算每个放射性示踪剂的合并值,并按包括的人群进行视觉或定量分析。系统评价确定了九项符合纳入条件的研究。报告相同放射性示踪剂的研究之间的方法差异很小。荟萃分析结果表明,所有示踪剂的合并敏感性和特异性值通常较高。通过计算似然比可以证实这一点。比率为正值的患者比比率为负值的患者更有可能患有AD,反之亦然。但是,仅将AD患者与健康对照相比,特异性更高。这项系统的审查和荟萃分析发现,三种β-淀粉样蛋白放射性示踪剂的诊断准确性无明显差异。当用于区分AD患者和健康对照者时,所有示踪剂的性能都更好。定量和视觉分析的灵敏度和特异性与用于诊断AD的其他成像或生物标记技术相当。需要进一步的研究以鉴定出提供最高灵敏度和特异性的试验组合,并鉴定出示踪剂在临床途径中最合适的位置。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号